NZHistory.net Gallery Waitangi Day

The Late 1980s: Labour Plays it Down


1930
1940

Centennial celebration

1950
1960

The Waitangi Day Act

The 1960s

1970

Early 1970s: Protest

A National Holiday

New Zealand Day 1974

Back to Waitangi Day, 1976

1980

Confrontation and Disruption

Labour Plays it Down

1990

1990: Sesquicentennial

Partnership Proposals

1995 and beyond


Related Links:


Labour won the election in mid 1984, and late in the year decided on a strategic repositioning of Waitangi Day: a low-key official ceremony in Wellington's Beehive and a brief morning commemoration on the treaty house grounds. There were protests at both functions and the northern Maori opinion, as expressed by Graham Latimer, was that Tai Tokerau's special part in the day had been bypassed.

In 1986 a similar programme was followed, with more promotion of the day as a national celebration: there were two partners to the treaty, but the Pakeha partner now had many cultures to be acknowledged. When the dual commemoration pattern was repeated in 1987, protesters at Waitangi made speech-making nearly impossible. 1985 headline (3k)It was obvious that dual ceremonies were not going to silence protest. The government decided that in 1988 there would be no official commemoration. Local authorities could begin to consider appropriate ways of recognising the 150th anniversary of the treaty in 1990. Northern Maori recognised Waitangi Day, but protest was controlled. The far northern Maori group Te Kawariki was given a right to speak: �The real issue', said its leader Shane Jones, �is sovereignty over our resources.'

Labour had pledged to deal with treaty issues and had set in motion a series of measures to change the treaty's position in the nation's life. By the end of the 1980s these included several pieces of legislation, the requirement that government agencies be more bicultural in their mode of operation, and an extension of the Waitangi Tribunal's powers allowing it to investigate claims dating back to 1840. But the process of resolving claims was slow.

As Shane Jones observed in 1988, Maori sovereignty or control over resources remained an elusive goal. Yet Maori sovereignty � defined over the years in various ways as mana motuhake, autonomy, self-determination, or self-regulation � has been one of the most enduring Maori understandings of the treaty's second article (in which te tino rangatiratanga was not ceded but guaranteed). In the 1990s this was to be far more explicitly expressed in protests.