Anti-Vietnam War protests in Queen Street, Auckland

12 May 1971

A civic reception for 161 Battery on its return from Vietnam was disrupted by protesters who accused New Zealand soldiers of being murderers and threw red paint to symbolise the Vietnamese blood they had on their hands.

The Vietnam War was this country’s longest and most controversial 20th-century military commitment. As in other countries, New Zealand’s involvement aroused considerable public debate. By 1971 up to 35,000 people were protesting on the streets. Many argued that the conflict was a civil war in which New Zealand should play no part. They wanted this country to follow an independent path in foreign policy, not take its cue from others.

Between June 1964 and December 1972 nearly 3400 New Zealand armed forces personnel served in South Vietnam. Compared to the First and Second World Wars, our contribution was small. At its peak in 1968 the New Zealand force numbered just 543. A total of 37 died while on active service, and 187 were wounded.

New Zealand Prime Minister Keith Holyoake’s approach to Vietnam was cautious. Under American pressure, the government agreed in 1963 to provide a small non-combatant military force. In June 1964, 25 army engineers arrived in South Vietnam, where they were engaged in projects such as road- and bridge-building. In May 1965 Holyoake announced the government’s decision to send 161 Battery, Royal New Zealand Artillery, to South Vietnam in a combat role. The gunners were later joined by infantry units. The battery returned home in May 1971 after providing virtually continuous fire support (mainly to Australian and New Zealand infantry) for six years.

Image: Anti-war protest (VietnamWar.govt.nz)

Community contributions

3 comments have been posted about Anti-Vietnam War protests in Queen Street, Auckland

What do you know?

Joseph Valicenti

Posted: 21 May 2015

Mr. Phipps:

Thank you for the reply and the sources. They are appreciated. : )

Gareth Phipps

Posted: 21 Apr 2015

Hi Joseph

A summary of this incident is on the www.vietnamwar.govt.nz website: http://www.vietnamwar.govt.nz/memory/john-miller-slide-show. This information was sourced from newspaper reports in the New Zealand Herald (11-13 May 1971).

For Progressive Youth Movement (PYM) members’ recollection of this protest and film footage of the parade, see Rebels in Retrospect: http://www.ngataonga.org.nz/feature-project/pages/rebels-retrospect.php. See also Claire Hall, No Front Line: Inside Stories of New Zealand’s Vietnam War, pgs 274-276.

Regards

Gareth Phipps

Joseph Valicenti

Posted: 17 Apr 2015

I am an American Grad student currently writing a capstone to view the historiography of the supposed "Myth" regarding Vietnam veterans being spit upon, called baby killers, and enduring other forms of abuse from civilians.

In the states this seems to be a general idea that has no hard evidence to back in self up, other than numerous veterans accounts.

My argument is that the United States was not alone in fighting the war, so possibly, by taking an international perspective with the veterans of American allies there may be more possible truth to the myth than originally thought.

For this article above, the introduction supports my argument, however I do not see where this information was found. I assume it is a newspaper report, or something to that nature. If anyone could provide me with this information I would greatly appreciate it, as I wish to use this site and its content as a source in my paper.

Thank you