Troops in trench during the Battle of the Somme

British infantry preparing to move forward to the front line during the Battle of the Somme.

Community contributions

5 comments have been posted about Troops in trench during the Battle of the Somme

What do you know?

8055Bell

Posted: 27 May 2013

This photo is published elsewhere. IWM Perhaps...It shows the Lancashire Fusiliers in an assembly trench on 1st July 1916.
http://17thmanchesters.wordpress.com/the-big-push/

Peter MacDonald

Posted: 19 May 2010

This is not a frontline Trench, this is a trench that is to the rear of the frontline, either a supervision or communication trench, these men are preparing to move forward into the frontline trench, they have fixed baonettes, and they would be preparing themselves with last minute checks of their equipment, ammo states, rations and section stores etc. a Frontline trench is wider and is fortified either with a zig zag formation or dug in squares , so their is no feild of fire down a straight line trench such as the one these men are in, also it has fire steps,so men can take up fire positions in case of a surprise assault by the enemy, and these men a relaxing and milling prior to hoving their instincts for battle, a front linr trench is less crowded and more formal.

Damien Fenton

Posted: 02 Apr 2009

The trenches of the Western Front were primarily designed to protect soldiers from enemy artillery and small arms fire while they were guarding the frontline. The most effective trenches in this regard were narrow and deep ones and so this tended to be the design used wherever possible. That said, the soil in some areas was too soft or waterlogged to allow this and in such places comparatively broader and shallow trenches had to be used instead. Most frontline trenches were not designed to be places where a soldier was expected to live for any significant length of time - in the British Army (and by extension the New Zealand Division) a rotation system was used where an infantry battalion would man the trenches for 48 hours and then be relieved by another battalion. So normally (big battles excepted) no soldier was expected to be in the trenches for more than two days at a time. Given this there was no real need to try and build 'creature comforts' such as permanent cooking, sleeping or washing facilities in the trenches. Instead these sorts of things were taken care of in camps and billets immediately behind the lines (usually just far enough back to be out of range of all but the heaviest enemy guns). Furthermore, experience early on in the war had demonstrated that cramming as many soldiers as possible in to the frontline trenches just led to greater casualties without really adding anything to the defence. So if a battalion (approximately 1000 men) could adequately defend a sector of the line there was nothing to be gained by trying to squeeze another battalion into the same trenches - this would achieve nothing other than to provide more targets for enemy snipers and artillery fire during the battalion's 48 hour 'stint' in the line.

Anonymous

Posted: 02 Apr 2009

i think it could have beeen a bit bigger and a bit wider so they could have got more peopel it the trenches and got more food and equitmeant in them